[193900] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Cellular enabled console server
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jensen Tyler)
Thu Mar 2 09:33:39 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jensen Tyler <JTyler@fiberutilities.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:13:36 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20170224162608.GA91541@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
+1 for opengear as well. We have over 100 deployed and have been a solid pr=
oduct as well as a good company to work with.
We also setup a private network with Verizon so that our console servers wo=
uld not be on the Internet.
Jensen Tyler
Sr Engineering Manager
Fiberutilities Group, LLC
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Leo Bicknell
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 10:26 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Cellular enabled console server
In a message written on Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:08:52AM -0600, Ben Bartsch =
wrote:
> NANOG - Are any of you running a console server to access your network=20
> equipment via a serial connection at a remote site? If so, what are=20
> you using and how much do you like it? I have a project where I need=20
> to stand up over 100 remote sites and would like a backdoor to the=20
> console just to be able to see what's going on with the equipment to=20
> hopefully avoid a truck roll for something simple like a hung device. =20
> I need 4 console ports and 1 RJ45 ethernet jack. My quick Google=20
> search landed me at BlackBox LES1204A-3G-R2, but I've never actually=20
> used such a device. This would be for use in the USA.
OpenGear all the way. Models for every need.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
