[193643] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IoT security
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Feb 9 15:59:20 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu
X-Google-Original-From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: clinton mielke <clinton.mielke@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANq0y_1DVe3m2Z1sNfozg2GF6ViOc8xjBZY_9geDkuRCA5Ht9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 15:03:55 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1486670635_2886P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 08 Feb 2017 22:19:01 -0800, clinton mielke said:
> Yup! All the mapping Ive done is over port 80. Id have a lot more than I
> currently have if I was looking at other ports, probably.
Wow. How does this work if more than one IoPT(*)
device is in play in the home network, especially from different manufacturers?
(*) Internet of Pwned Things.
--==_Exmh_1486670635_2886P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iQEVAwUBWJzLK40DS38y7CIcAQLF0Af9GlTNAjABp6qOLpOQAr8Hm045Uy2FF1MA
KFV8W6SHxjC671FEmEjEW06iFe+d7Esa6oA35Q5TH4LxCpbCmhZ/QaNcz1QiWpeK
4ltDybOSmUipZfHXxLhpzI7dgZskaQjFBd0vi6ezXrtp6LhT90m/QVt2OjMW0IJ9
My8y8LetogzHsuydKzG6Mrs98bH16TwW0Jp9NPWF0x+uEOazJbmnSIn7h9AjOV5I
EmIjW3zRYldZZKWw62qfhu/9628Wyc3mmDE3AVL2xyPdCiX8Tqfsdh9m4NU7i7hz
XDEnKbZNy/DEyMNwJmlia2mQ+UfCF0vwYzB9nmo1hb7xP9kFMXknRw==
=40LR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1486670635_2886P--
