[193590] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bob Evans)
Mon Feb 6 19:09:17 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4094203a-c8ba-4afa-b16c-2506b7dd0f10@Spark>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:58:53 -0800
From: "Bob Evans" <bob@FiberInternetCenter.com>
To: "Dave Temkin" <dave@temk.in>
Reply-To: bob@FiberInternetCenter.com
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I suggest in the future NOT to get rid of something because a new method
is attempted. I.E nanog had a nice method of identifying potential and
existing peers with a simple green dot at registration to indicate an
individual was involved with BGP in their company. That went away and
today there is nothing. Cost of implementation was less than 5 dollars at
any office supply retailer.
Just a thought.
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
> The Peering Personals has been shelved while we try to figure out a better
> option.
>
> There was no peering content submitted to the Program Committee that
> justified a separate track, and so they chose to include the content in
> the general session throughout the program.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Dave
>
> On Feb 6, 2017, 8:12 AM -0500, Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>,
> wrote:
>> I'm squinting at the Guidebook for NANOG69,
>> and I don't seem to see any peering BOF or
>> peering social this time around. Am I being
>> blind again, and it's on the agenda somewhere
>> but I'm just overlooking it?
>> Pointers in the right direction would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks! :)
>>
>> Matt
>
