[193329] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Advice re network compromise and "law enforcement" (PCI
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Freitag)
Wed Jan 11 10:23:39 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20170111151942.GA18010@gsp.org>
From: Matt Freitag <mlfreita@mtu.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:23:34 -0500
To: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
Reply-To: mlfreita@mtu.edu
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Adding to what Rich said, it's very easy for advice on this to cross into
advice on legal matters.
It's also usually very illegal for non-attorneys or non-licensed attorneys
to offer advice on legal matters.
I recommend finding a lawyer with expertise in this area and who has
specific knowledge of your operation.
Matt Freitag
Network Engineer I
Information Technology
Michigan Technological University
(906) 487-3696 <%28906%29%20487-3696>
https://www.mtu.edu/
https://www.it.mtu.edu/
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:37:19AM -0500, David H wrote:
> > Anyone have pointers/advice on what you came up with for a reasonable
> > definition of events that warrant involving law enforcement, and then
> what
> > agency/agencies would be contacted?
>
> This question is best answered by an attorney with expertise in this area
> and with specific knowledge of your operation.
>
> ---rsk
>
