[193252] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Someone didn't get the leap second memo...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard Hicks)
Sat Dec 31 21:17:10 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20170101014717.GA5132@bamboo.slabnet.com>
From: Richard Hicks <richard.hicks@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 18:17:05 -0800
To: Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
We had some ASR1001s routers reboot.
Looks like we hit this bug:
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvb01730
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com> wrote:
> Had a set of Cisco ASR1004s running 15.4(3)S1 (on IOS-XE 03.13.01.S) all
> restart at around midnight UTC, and all with `Last reload reason:
> Watchdog`, with those boxes being at separate DCs in different regions.
> I'm assuming when I call TAC I'll get a "whoops; sorry".
>
> --
> Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo@slabnet.com
> pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
>
>
> On Sun 2017-Jan-01 01:02:24 +0000, Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com> wrote:
>
> [root@hayden ~]# ntpq -p
>> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
>> jitter
>> ============================================================
>> ==================
>> LOCAL(0) .LOCL. 10 l 20d 64 0 0.000 0.000
>> 0.000
>> -clock.xmission. 132.163.4.103 2 u 169 256 377 66.078 -1.302
>> 0.164
>> xclock.sjc.he.ne 10.200.208.2 2 u 13 256 315 65.689 999.633
>> 2.015
>> +tock.usshc.com .GPS. 1 u 87 256 377 26.930 -0.550
>> 0.121
>> *ntp.your.org .CDMA. 1 u 43 256 217 23.339 0.544
>> 0.069
>>
>> Our batch system went belly up, but other than that, no other apparent
>> leap second issues.
>>
>> ----
>> Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd
>> Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577
>> OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039
>> aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669
>>
>>
>>
