[193229] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Thu Dec 29 14:11:49 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:11:42 -0800
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <175344.1483035748@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 01:22:28PM -0500, Valdis.Kletn=
ieks@vt.edu wrote:
> Say you're doing business in 100 countries, with some stated level of
> possible autonomy for each business unit.
In all honesty, the original question was a poor straw man for multiple
reasons:
* Basically nobody does business in 100 countries. Level 3 only claims
60. Verizon does claim 150, but a lot of those are rather arms-length
deals. Apple has a "presense" in 97 countries. It's a question about
perhaps not a unicorn, but a rare albino pony only seen a few times in
the wild!
* The companies that do business in these countries rarely have "100
national business units". The chance that all countries are wholy
owned subsidiaries created by the corporate parent is zero. They
are parterships, co-branding deals, buyouts of existing companies.
All of which bring baggage that affects the question more than any
any technical details.
* Because of how these entities come to be, the chance that the network
contains Vendor's A and B, and corporate gets to dictate anything is
zero. The network will have Vendors A-Z, plus a few more. Legacy
stuff hidden in corners from 50 different M&A activities. Multiple
engineering teams, in multiple locations.
* Technical people never get to decide the level of "autonomy". A mix
of local laws, M&A terms, and other business interests will rule.
> Is it better for upper corporate to say "all 100 national business units
> will use vendor A for edge devices and vendor B for routing", or "all 100
> business units shall choose, based on local conditions such as vendor
> support, a standard set of vendors for their operations"?
Which leads to an easy answer. It's better for upper corporate to
negotiate bulk deals (note I did not say one vendor) and offer standard
solutions to each national BU, so that the engineering does not need to
be repeated 100 times. Simple economies of scale. That said, some
number of the national BU's will not follow that advice, for perhaps
good and often bad reason.
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=ywWD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg--
