[193145] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Kirch)
Wed Dec 21 22:11:27 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+E3k915LnXvuKQocJ6UMdQZnZM=gvrdCrfGS8bQqWQXYMUx-w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:54:42 -0500
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I can't for the life of me see why we'd have to deal with it in the course
of our jobs beyond calling someone and having them install more A/C. This
is, flat-out, off topic.
Andrew
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Royce Williams <royce@techsolvency.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Ken Chase <math@sizone.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 04:41:29PM -0800, Doug Barton said:
> > [..]
> > >>Everyone has a line at which "I don't care what's in the pipes, I
> just
> > >>work here" changes into something more actionable.
> > >
> > >Stretched far beyond any credibility. Your argument boils down to,
> "If it's
> > >a political thing that *I* like, it's on topic."
>
> I can see why you've concluded that. My final phrasing was indeed
> ambiguous. I would have hoped that the rest of my carefully
> non-partisan post would have offset that ambiguity.
>
> > "If it's a politically-generated thing I'll have to deal with at an
> > operational level, it's on topic."
> >
> > That work?
>
> That is indeed what I was trying to say - thanks, Ken.
>
> Royce
>
