[193118] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: South Carolina attempts to repeal Rule 34

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Levine)
Tue Dec 20 13:42:04 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: 20 Dec 2016 18:41:35 -0000
From: "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAM3TTh38kDSuGbO6am+cmm-CZVH5PVXYND08mMwP=rVnFza-Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

In article <CAM3TTh38kDSuGbO6am+cmm-CZVH5PVXYND08mMwP=rVnFza-Jg@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>Let's call it for what it is. It's a new tax.

No, it's just grandstanding.  The proposed law egregiously violates
the First Amendment and wouldn't last 5 minutes in a court challenge.

R's,
John

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post