[192761] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: China to HK providers you like?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve SY Fan)
Sat Nov 19 21:00:46 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Steve SY Fan <sfan@chtsc.net>
In-Reply-To: <DM3PR13MB0704A2EADFE70D5C1F174C78E4B00@DM3PR13MB0704.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:10:45 +0800
To: Rod Beck <rod.beck@unitedcablecompany.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
You asking for a close circuit, point-to-point one?
B'rgds
Sent from my mobile device
> On Nov 19, 2016, at 4:51 AM, Rod Beck <rod.beck@unitedcablecompany.com> wr=
ote:
>=20
> PCCW might be a good choice given that Hong Kong is the gateway to China.
>=20
>=20
> ________________________________
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of John A. Kilpatrick <joh=
n@hypergeek.net>
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 7:54 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: China to HK providers you like?
>=20
>=20
> It's been a while since I've had to look at mainland China connectivity -
> what is the current situation for point-to-point business circuits from
> China domestic locations to a datacenter in HK? Does anyone have
> providers they like?
>=20
>=20
> --
> John A. Kilpatrick
> john@hypergeek.net | http://www.hypergeek.net/
> Hypergeek.net<http://www.hypergeek.net/>
> www.hypergeek.net
> A lot of this ride covered the area from my Sunday ride last weekend. We h=
eaded south along Blossom Hill until it turned into Santa Theresa - going in=
the opposite ...
>=20
>=20
> remember: no obstacles/only challenges
>=20
>=20
