[192747] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Amsterdam/London Underesea Cables
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pierfrancesco Caci)
Fri Nov 18 12:39:48 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Pierfrancesco Caci <pf@tippete.net>
To: "nanog\@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:39:39 +0100
In-Reply-To: <DM3PR13MB07047801A8BB8C08A0845701E4B00@DM3PR13MB0704.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
(Rod Beck's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:54:13 +0000")
Reply-To: Pierfrancesco Caci <pf@tippete.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
>>>>> "Rod" == Rod Beck <rod.beck@unitedcablecompany.com> writes:
Rod> Hi,
Rod> I am trying to determine which undersea cables used for
Rod> London/Amsterdam traffic are the most reliable - fewest outages due to
Rod> shunt faults and other problems.
I'm surprised repeaters are needed at all, the Channel is not that wide
after all.
--
Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx
