[192657] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri Nov 11 01:20:58 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 07:37:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAC6=tfaR43LSW2YPBK3GQR4g057rO85WMQaHKkpJftt0M-7PiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 10/Nov/16 20:01, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> Cisco is the only "real" IS-IS vendor.
>
> Juniper, Brocade, Arista, Avaya, etc you're not getting it. Any of the
> whitebox hardware or real SDN capable solutions, you're going to be on
> OSPF.
>
We are quite happy with our Cisco-Juniper IS-IS interactions.
Granted, IOS, IOS XE and IOS XR all have several IS-IS knobs that
Juniper don't, but in all fairness, we aren't complaining.
We have the right knobs in the right place on each vendor kit to run a
successful IGP domain.
Mark.
