[192653] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri Nov 11 00:49:16 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 07:46:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAC6=tfaFn-6Y=pvhTL8eWWmwd3dBEzV6F1EyuAbvfYxrGMWXeA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 11/Nov/16 00:03, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> Since the last time I looked, I could not get the same feature sets running
> IS-IS in a multi-vendor environment as I could running OSPF. This was my
> experience at the time, based on my research and discussions with the
> vendors.
I'd be curious to know what features you were getting in OSPF that were
unavailable in IS-IS, at the time.
Mark.
