[192634] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Reynolds)
Thu Nov 10 15:33:25 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <5824D82D.9090607@foobar.org>
From: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:33:22 -0600
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I have not kept up with all of the feature differences between Cisco's
implementation and the other vendors. I can only encourage others
interested in this to compare the specific feature sets between the
two and see if it meets their needs. What I need in an environment
from an IGP may be totally different from another data center,
transport, or transit network provider.
If I were a vendor or one of the other I would likely have a list of
what I do support, or what my competition does not support.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> Josh Reynolds wrote:
>> As with anything, it depends on what your needs are.
>>
>> https://pathfinder.juniper.net/feature-explorer/search-features.html
>>
>> Type IS-IS in the box
>>
>> Feature set will vary between JunOS releases.
>
> Josh,
>
> you made two statements:
>
> 1. Juniper was "not getting it" and
> 2. "they miss many of the IS-IS features Cisco has".
>
> Could you provide details on these "many" features that Junos is
> missing? Linking to Juniper's feature explorer is hand-waving, and does
> not answer the question.
>
> Nick
>
