[192620] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Nov 10 09:38:10 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: =?UTF-8?B?WmJ5bsSbayBQb3Nww61jaGFs?= <zbynek@dialtelecom.cz>,
James Bensley <jwbensley@gmail.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:34:31 +0200
In-Reply-To: <83076d43-4581-eafd-606f-b3c3812c8109@dialtelecom.cz>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10/Nov/16 12:54, Zbyněk Pospíchal wrote:
> In theory, yes. In the real world operators need MPLS label
> distribution, which is still not supported in many implementations.
But dual-stack protocol support in the IGP has nothing to do with MPLS.
Now, if you're talking about LDPv6 or SR, then...
Mark.
