[192615] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?UTF-8?B?WmJ5bsSbayBQb3Nww61jaGFs)
Thu Nov 10 05:54:42 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: James Bensley <jwbensley@gmail.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
From: "=?UTF-8?B?WmJ5bsSbayBQb3Nww61jaGFs?=" <zbynek@dialtelecom.cz>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:54:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAAWx_pU4L09za-Wc34UcSaZkOy9bLTAk54WLo6zZ7cTGtaxLkA@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Dne 10.11.16 v 11:17 James Bensley wrote:
>> * Integrated IPv4/IPv6 protocol support in a single IGP implementation.
>
> This is in OSPv3.
In theory, yes. In the real world operators need MPLS label
distribution, which is still not supported in many implementations.
Regards,
Zbynek
