[192608] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Nov 10 01:15:15 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>, RT Parrish <routetarget@gmail.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:13:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAC6=tfaYDaLLSHWcSg1ybkEB_CKVvtDrpShCSzPjDVFcQbhimw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 10/Nov/16 04:52, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> Vendor support for IS-IS is quite limited - many options for OSPF.
Depends on the vendor.
Cisco have as many knobs for IS-IS as they do for OSPF.
Juniper, not so much.
Don't know about other vendors.
At any rate, many of these knobs are not part of the original protocol
spec., although they can be very useful when scaling.
Mark.
