[192521] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another day,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Oct 31 10:20:10 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <21691.1477697805@segfault.tristatelogic.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:20:06 -0400
To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
wrote:
> In my own defense, I didn't see the ARIN allocation because I have a
> normative process that I use for looking up IP addresses. It's
> hierarchical, and I always start with whatver whois.iana.org has to
> say. And it says that that 103.0.0.0/8 belongs to APNIC, so of course,
> I only looked at what whois.apnic.net had to say about 103.11.67.105.
> And it says that it's unallocated. (And apparently, data shown for
> announced prefixes on the bgp.he.net web site is also obtained in this
> same straightforward way, because it also is showing 103.11.67.0/24 as
> registered to "Asia Pacific Network Information Centre".)
>
In this new world of inter-rir transfers your process needs a revision.
it's also not uncommon for hosting folks to allocate address space to
non-local customers.
