[192462] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another day, another illicit SQUAT - WebNX (AS18450)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ken Chase)
Fri Oct 28 19:58:14 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:58:12 -0400
From: Ken Chase <math@sizone.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:32:12AM +1100, Mark Andrews said:
>It's not the RIR's job. They already provide the framework for
>ISP's to do the job of policing route announcements themselves.
>ISP's just need to use that framework.
What incentive do the ISPs have to enforce any of this though?
In fact, they're making money sending bits over these prefixes.
What incentives could be created that the ISPs wont balk at as it
might affect their accidental revenues from "oh, gee, I didnt know it
was being squatted! <wink>" prefixes?
/kc
--
Ken Chase - math@sizone.org guelph canada
