[192450] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another day,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Doug Clements)
Fri Oct 28 18:11:02 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <21262.1477690823@segfault.tristatelogic.com>
From: Doug Clements <dclements@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:10:19 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
How does one get ARIN to register resources to come up with this result?
https://whois.arin.net/rest/nets;q=103.11.67.105
The /16 is APNIC but there are 2 subnets that appear to be allocated from
ARIN. Having just typed 'whois 103.11.67.105' I completely missed the fact
that the supernet was APNIC until I checked the web interface.
--Doug
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
wrote:
>
>
> I just got a spam from 103.11.67.105. The containing /24 appears to
> be unallocated APNIC space.
>
> RIPE tools seem to say that AS18450 has been routing this block since
> around May 23rd.
>
> I see this kind of stuff almost every day now, it seems. And you know,
> there are days when I really do start to wonder "Has the Internet gone
> mad?"
>
> I'm going to call these turkeys right now and just ask them, point
> blank, what the bleep they think they're doing, routing unallocated
> APNIC space. But if history is any guide, this is probably going to
> turn out to be another one of these "absentee landlord" kinds of ASes,
> where all they have is an answering machine.
>
> I have to either laugh or cry when I see people posting here about the
> non-functionality of abuse@ email addresses, and then see other people
> saying "Well, this is why all ASes also have phone numbers."
>
> I wish I had a dollar for every AS I had ever tried to contact where
> -neither- the abuse@ address -nor- the phone number got me to any
> actual human being.
>
>
> Regards,
> rfg
>
