[192416] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Satchell)
Thu Oct 27 18:20:25 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: J <nanog@namor.ca>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Stephen Satchell <list@satchell.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:20:20 -0700
In-Reply-To: <15807d65f42.fc28b465148492.6591941698600326830@namor.ca>
Reply-To: list@satchell.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 10/27/2016 01:30 PM, J wrote:
> I'm in the camp of not replying to every report.
I was in that camp, too, when I was mail admin for a web host company.
I wanted to spend my time fixing the flood, without having to take the
time to reply.
I figure the best reply is when the spamming stops. I have about 30
mail endpoints of my own that I monitor, so it becomes obvious real
quick when someone takes action. :)
