[192224] in North American Network Operators' Group
FW: Death of the Internet, Film at 11
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Keith Medcalf)
Sat Oct 22 19:26:20 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 17:03:44 -0600
In-Reply-To: <21505498d53f19429a65c2f1319ec4df@mail.dessus.com>
From: "Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf@dessus.com>
To: "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> It's also generally counter to them being available outside of that
> network.
This does not follow and is not a natural consequence of sealing the little=
buggers up so that they cannot affect the Internet (or you private network=
s). Even if you lock you pet mouse in a cage, you can still feed it and cl=
ean up the shit in the cage. It just isn't free to wander out and eat the =
floral arrangements on the end-table.
> (web and proprietary interfaces needed, SSH and telnet not).
> That's also not much I can do as a network operator.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Chris Boyd" <cboyd@gizmopartners.com>
> To: "Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 11:42:05 AM
> Subject: Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11
>
>
> > On Oct 22, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> wrote:
> >
> > "taken all necessary steps to insure that none of the numerous specific
> types of CCVT thingies that Krebs and others identified"
> >
> > Serious question... how?
>
> Putting them behind a firewall without general Internet access seems to
> work for us. We have a lot of cheap IP cameras in our facility and none o=
f
> them can reach the net. But this is probably a bit beyond the capabilitie=
s
> of the general home user.
>
> =E2=80=94Chris
>
