[192165] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Reynolds)
Fri Oct 21 20:10:51 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAC6=tfaoxubpqYBpKzzxkAy_jka_2ATBkuNZ1ANv=8Qs_qrEpg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:10:45 -0500
To: David Birdsong <david@imgix.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Ah, disregard. I see what you're saying now.
Yes, I can see how that would be problematic.
On Oct 21, 2016 6:40 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <josh@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
> Ansible would be a decent start.
>
> On Oct 21, 2016 5:26 PM, "David Birdsong" <david@imgix.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>
>> > anyone who relies on a single dns provider is just asking for stuff such
>> > as this.
>> >
>> > randy
>> >
>>
>> I'd love to hear how others are handling the overhead of managing two dns
>> providers. Every time we brainstorm on it, we see it as blackhole of eng
>> effort WRT to keeping them in sync and and then waiting for TTLs to cut an
>> entire delegation over.
>>
>
