[192008] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IoT security, was Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Oct 9 14:30:49 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Mel Beckman <mel@beckman.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <F40795A0-3C28-462D-BE78-8128E6824048@beckman.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2016 14:30:37 -0400
Cc: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1476037837_2137P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 09 Oct 2016 18:05:20 -0000, Mel Beckman said:
> I don't know why it's "sub optimal" to use the cloud from an isolated network. Can you elaborate?
Why should something out in the cloud have any part of the communication,
other than perhaps telling your cellphone the current address of your widget?
(And *that* should probably have a standardized protocol/service rather than
every vendor rolling their own. Hello, IETF?)
And even *that* can be bypassed if you cellphone is able to talk to your
home network directly.
--==_Exmh_1476037837_2137P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iQEVAwUBV/qMzY0DS38y7CIcAQKQlwf/afn6LJN6IrF1txjLfmljuNex/ydFT1W5
1fkTc5eBR7k981uBsi2Epn5JkCn92fnF1/Klk3JVWS2d7BGuK1IOAwX5Xid/q1zJ
AEXGWzofUYp7TWsD7FJowg2CDi4I0tTGISItni9vMGbsRG+DqC3INFEfjEgM7H44
P00deuMmTAjGAxUlOg+vsbNWtL9EySTl9Gh5rlccaLEj7yClTPIFooyp6jH954eF
PejrmtFhs4e7U59K95g3+nFbPlGUJkfaN3mvVzQQYJ7hdQn5/2nr85tFfDIeT+U1
OGx4gbRKDFRVMquAwqAHoH8OjzQXdxrRw9GAMBTdCLdiOTh1WABEcg==
=0gOI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1476037837_2137P--
