|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org To: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi> From: Bryan Holloway <bryan@shout.net> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 07:54:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <CAAeewD-Er6uyjqi6+DgSw_1xwS6Raep38oqD1ON-g-sZ9oqw8g@mail.gmail.com> Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org Mainly RFC2544 and physical media. QoS could be handy, but it's not as important as proving that the circuit is meeting our expectations from the carrier(s). On 10/4/16 1:12 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On 3 October 2016 at 22:09, Bryan Holloway <bryan@shout.net> wrote: >> We're in the market for a hand-held 10G ethernet tester, and I was curious >> if the NANOG community had any recommendations or experiences they would be >> willing to share, negative or positive. > > What are you looking to test? Are you interested in having the kit > emulate many devices? Do you want to be able to test QoS > realistically? Do you care about one-way latency accurately? > Or is this more about proving the physical media is fine? >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |