[191916] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Legislative proposal sent to my Congressman
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ted Hardie)
Mon Oct 3 21:10:37 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20161003203958.10869.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:54:21 -0700
To: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:39 PM, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
> In article <alpine.BSF.2.20.1610031257490.94184@orthanc.ca> you write:
> >> But that does not remove those devices from the network.
> >
> >That ship has sailed.
>
> This is where device profiles could help. If enough devices register
> profiles with the local router, at some point the router's default
> could be closed, so devices with no profile can't talk to the outside.
>
>
Hi John,
Are you thinking of MUD (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud/) here, when you say
"register profiles"?
regards,
Ted
> For a lot of devices like lightbulbs, that would probably make no
> difference at all. It would mean you couldn't remotely monitor your
> five year old CCTV camera unless you take in the camera for an upgrade
> or replace it, but I can't get too upset about that.
>
> R's,
> John
>
>
>
>
