[191788] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?UTF-8?B?WmJ5bsSbayBQb3Nww61jaGFs)
Tue Sep 27 09:29:07 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
From: "=?UTF-8?B?WmJ5bsSbayBQb3Nww61jaGFs?=" <zbynek@dialtelecom.cz>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:29:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1609271514520.1477@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Dne 27.09.16 v 15:17 Mikael Abrahamsson napsal(a):
> Hm, so the IX operator looks at packets at the IX (sFlow perhaps), see
> who is sending attack packets, and if they're spoofed, this ISP is then
> put in "quarantine", ie their IX port is basically now useless.
Definitely not. Try to read first instead of speculations.
Regards,
Zbynek
