[191685] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: One Year On: IPv4 Exhaust
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Radu-Adrian Feurdean)
Sun Sep 25 16:52:38 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <nanog@radu-adrian.feurdean.net>
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:50:42 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQ7hSh1oSe1fnWbh2qD6BGeVqKx0kMu_QBnZbfAxgGk3w@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016, at 18:29, Ca By wrote:
> Think it is fair to say big content and big eyeballs have moved to IPv6
> (notable exceptions exist)
>
> http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2016/08/facebook-akamai-pass-major-milestone-over-50-ipv6-from-us-mobile-networks/
Big, yes, many - not really.
While looking in the flow logs I could see the same (bandwidth
intensive) destinations again and again. It's like ~4-5 destinations
doing at least half of the IPv6 traffic.
