[191433] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Wed Sep 14 16:59:19 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <ef2d13c0-5369-74ef-71c1-27ac26ef808f@bryanfields.net>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:59:14 -0400
To: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net> wrote:
> On 9/14/16 3:09 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> >
> > Yes, RPKI. That's what I was waiting for. Now we can get to
> > a real discussion
>
> Problem is, RPKI does not work for people with legacy blocks who will not
> sign
> a Legacy RSA. ARIN doesn't own or have any say on how we use it, and we're
>
sure it does, move your registration to ripe.
<http://www.iepg.org/2016-04-03-ietf95/160403.iepg-transfer.pdf>
(this was also given at nanog or ripe or something, I couldn't remember
which was the right one)
> sure as heck not going to sign a legally binding contract saying they do :)
>
>
don't have to... see preso.
> I'm a bit ambivalent about BGP hijacking as a DDOS mitigation strategy.
> Really there is no authority to say it's wrong. If your peers are cool
> with
> it, and their peers are cool with it who's to say it's wrong?
>
> --
> Bryan Fields
>
> 727-409-1194 - Voice
> http://bryanfields.net
>
