[191427] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Wed Sep 14 00:05:02 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:04:13 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20f702e2-913a-5c03-8ba2-4513faceb228@ispn.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On 13/09/2016 23:22, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Ca By wrote on 9/13/2016 2:53 PM:
>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016, Bryant Townsend <bryant@backconnect.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Tip to the RIR policy folks, you may want to make this point very
>> crisp. A
>> BGP ASN is the fundamental accountability control in a inter-domain
>> routing. Organizations with repeated offensense need to have their ASN
>> revoked, and further there should be controls in places so bad actors
>> cannot acquire "burner" ASNs.

The RIRs have made it very clear that they will not get involved.  Period.

-Hank

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post