[191027] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DNS Services for a registrar
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (DaKnOb)
Fri Aug 12 23:18:20 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: DaKnOb <daknob.mac@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2241B24E-46BF-4921-80CD-1D3F29945077@neilltech.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 18:44:42 +0300
To: Keith Stokes <keiths@neilltech.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On 12 Aug 2016, at 18:36, Keith Stokes <keiths@neilltech.com> wrote:
>=20
> Route53 can get expensive for lots of domains. Queries are cheap with =
the first 1M free, but if you have 1000 domains you=E2=80=99ll pay =
$500/month.
>=20
> You can build dedicated servers in multiple AZs and data centers able =
to handle that many domains for far less.
I=E2=80=99d also recommend multiple providers as well if you=E2=80=99re =
getting dedicated servers so you can avoid non-technical provider-based =
issues.
>=20
> You might also consider running dedicated servers in each of AWS and =
Azure to avoid a single-provider failure.
>=20
> On Aug 12, 2016, at 9:44 AM, John Kinsella =
<jlk@thrashyour.com<mailto:jlk@thrashyour.com>> wrote:
>=20
> Also a big fan of DNS Made easy, but I wish they=E2=80=99d add DNSSEC =
already.
>=20
> I=E2=80=99m happy with AWS - one thing to consider is model out the =
network costs. That seems to get some people, who just expect the bill =
for instances at end of month. If you=E2=80=99re worried about =
availability due to an availability zone going down, ensure you have the =
service replicated across multiple AZs or regions and
>=20
> It might be worth a few minutes pondering just using Amazon=E2=80=99s =
Route53 instead of running the DNS server yourself. I haven=E2=80=99t =
looked at how the cost compares.
>=20
> On Aug 12, 2016, at 6:41 AM, Peter Beckman =
<beckman@angryox.com<mailto:beckman@angryox.com>> wrote:
>=20
> I highly recommend DNS Made Easy. Super fast, extremely reliable (100% =
up
> time in the last 10-12 years excluding an 8 hour period 4-5 years ago =
where
> they got DDOSed, no issues since), very affordable.
>=20
> #2 fastest for July: http://www.solvedns.com/dns-comparison/2016/07
>=20
> Has been #1 several months this year.
>=20
> Beckman
>=20
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
>=20
> We need to provide DNS services for domains we offer as a registrar. =
We were discussing internally the different options for the deployment. =
Does anyone see a down side to using IaaS on AWS and Azure?
>=20
> We were also kicking around the idea of a PaaS offering and using =
Azure DNS or AWS Route 53.
>=20
> Cheers
> Ryan
>=20
>=20
>=20
> =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
> Peter Beckman =
Internet Guy
> beckman@angryox.com<mailto:beckman@angryox.com> =
http://www.angryox.com/
> =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ---
>=20
> Keith Stokes
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
