[190861] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cloudflare, dirty networks and politricks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Satchell)
Thu Jul 28 20:54:51 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "J. Oquendo" <joquendo@e-fensive.net>, Phil Rosenthal <pr@isprime.com>
From: Stephen Satchell <list@satchell.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:52:02 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20160728171708.GA87119@e-fensive.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 07/28/2016 10:17 AM, J. Oquendo wrote:
> While many are chanting: #NetworkLivesMatter, I have yet
> to see, read, or hear about any network provider being
> the first to set precedence by either de-peering, or
> blocking traffic from Cloudflare. There is a lot of
> keyboard posturing: "I am mad and I am not going to take
> it anymore" hooplah but no one is lifting a finger to
> do anything other than regurgitate "I am mad... This is
> criminal."
Let's supposed someone did indeed de-peer or otherwise block Cloudflare
from their entire network.
Which of y'all would be the first to say to that network operator, "Hope
you enjoy your intranet"?
