[190695] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: I recommend dslreports.com/speedtest these days (was
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Tykwinski)
Thu Jul 21 20:13:57 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Eric Tykwinski <eric-list@truenet.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 20:11:36 -0400
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <113466DC-5310-4A75-A2C4-C4D7CC8AE4C5@f5.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This is probably for Jim Gettys directly, but I=E2=80=99m sure most =
others have input. I could of sworn that that there was some test made =
to detect it directly on switches and routers? Sort of like iperf, but =
to test bufferbloat specifically given the OS stack which is going to =
have issues as well, as shown on bufferbloat.net =
<http://bufferbloat.net/>.=20
> On Jul 21, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Donn Lasher via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> =
wrote:
>=20
> On 7/21/16, 2:19 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Jay R. Ashworth" =
<nanog-bounces@nanog.org on behalf of jra@baylink.com> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Janusz Jezowicz" <janusz@speedchecker.xyz>
>>=20
>>> Since this morning Speedtest.net is not accessible in Chrome
>>> Reason:
>>> =
https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagnostic/#url=3Dc=
.speedtest.net
>>>=20
>>> For any ISPs/content providers linking to speedtest.net you may want =
to
>>> swap links to a different website or host your own speed test.
>>=20
>> So far, I am very pleased with how it works, though I think it's =
letter
>> grades on speed are a bit pessimistic (65Mbps is a "C").
>>=20
>> Specifically, it measures bufferbloat, with both a realtime graph and =
a=20
>=20
>=20
> Are you talking about the dslreports speedtest? I like that one, very =
detailed results.
>=20
> http://speedtest.dslreports.com/
>=20
>=20
> I=E2=80=99d agree with the pessimistic scoring.. 160Mbit was given a =
=E2=80=9CB=E2=80=9D grade.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
