[190518] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: New ICANN registrant change process
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Wed Jul 6 13:23:09 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <6C958391-E2F3-413A-98ED-C689B819F42E@baylink.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:23:04 -0400
To: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
> Seems to me that the proper thing to be done would have been for
> Registries to deauthorize registrars on the grounds of continuous streams
> of complaints.
>
>
<devils advocate hat>
On what metric? Pure volume? Percent of registrations? type of complaint by
similar x/y?
</devils advocate hat>
there are 'lots of complaints' against some registrars, but if you have
~20% of the .TLD market you're prone to get more volume than a 1%er, right?
Also, this isn't REALLY the registrY's problem is it?
i love how icann makes avoiding blame so easy.
