[190494] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT firewall for IPv6?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Jul 5 12:18:28 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Spencer Ryan <sryan@arbor.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <CA+HzidS8otKFDvjiT2yRVzTDyQ0T_nv-ZWJuJ0qL8OSHFyWjhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:18:12 -0400
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1467735492_2060P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 11:54:14 -0400, Spencer Ryan said:
> The Palo-Alto's also don't support anything but NAT64,
They don't support proper dual-stack?? Or NAT64 is the only NAT flavor
they support on the v6 side?
--==_Exmh_1467735492_2060P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=us78
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1467735492_2060P--
