|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 10:55:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> To: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPkb-7B9AhtLvpn+tzYX_4PEcehaUE7k+dXX7HhmbyVeuYr8mQ@mail.gmail.com> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > We will tell you to use IPv6 for that or make you pay extra for a > dedicated IPv4 address. That is a good solution to that problem. I hope all ISPs implementing A+P protocols does that. It also puts a monthly cost that teleworkers have to pay (or their employers have to pay) for not supporting IPv6 on their enterprise solutions. Hopefully that'll drive IPv6 interest in the enterprise space as well. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |