[190442] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv6 deployment excuses

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Mon Jul 4 16:53:37 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Matt Hoppes <mattlists@rivervalleyinternet.net>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 22:53:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <B9CDA0F3-AE6F-435D-9904-C2AE05BCCCCB@rivervalleyinternet.net>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org



On 4/Jul/16 14:44, Matt Hoppes wrote:

> I disagree. Any data center or hosting provider is going to continue to offer IPv4 lest they island themselves from subscribers who have IPv4 only - which no data center is going to do. 

But that's what I said...

Mark.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post