[190405] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 deployment excuses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Sun Jul 3 05:42:30 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll@gmail.com>, Mike Jones <mike@mikejones.in>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:42:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CANdN9jZ=5LkmTwEd-yBnhmKmqJCwSOMDy9H0rEnTqC0QY7b0rA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 2/Jul/16 17:35, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
> - ECMP issues (Mostly around flow labels and vendor support for that, also
> feeds back into PMTUD issues)
Do you rely on the ToS field in IPv4 for ECMP?
> - Maintaining 2x IP stacks is inherently expensive Vs 1
How so?
Mark.
