[190294] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP and Optical domains?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Wed Jun 22 07:19:59 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>, nanog@nanog.org
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:17:35 +0900
In-Reply-To: <a1a5762d-b6ff-d9f9-dc7d-9229fcc37a5d@seacom.mu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Mark Tinka wrote:
> Typical awareness about the transport layer is not normally privy to IP.
> Yes, IPoDWDM means the visbility is there, but really, all it's doing is
> cutting off a link just before the thresholds are met, to avoid packet loss.
What? "the visibility is there"?
I think you mean IPoDWDM something so much different from
usual ways to have IP over something.
Do you have any reference to it?
For my definition of IPoDWDM, see, for example:
"Standardization of optical packet switching with
many-wavelength packets"
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=4542288
or my newest paper in HPSR2016.
Masataka Ohta
