|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:10:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Milhollan <mlm@pixelgate.net> To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> In-Reply-To: <3FA69398-0647-47A2-8644-84C9B914F70B@delong.com> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Owen DeLong wrote: >On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:57 , Ricky Beam <jfbeam@gmail.com> wrote: >>I've seen many "IPv6 Capable" CPEs that apply ZERO security to IPv6 traffic. > >Those are by definition poorly designed CPE. This (open by default vs closed) has been discussed before, with plenty of people on either side. /mark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |