[190183] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Fri Jun 17 09:48:43 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:48:35 -0700
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <514735F7-FFA8-4B41-BC51-B80AB4D8C2C6@harg.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message written on Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:56:36PM +0100, Will Hargrav=
e wrote:
> Most of the major IXs in the European market operate in multiple=20
> datacentres. Why? Because it decreases the monopoly conferred upon one=20
> particular datacentre in a market which becomes the =E2=80=98go to=E2=80=
=99=20
> location.

It moves the monopoly to the IXP operator!

When everyone is in one facility (or at least building) it is
typically easy to get low priced (although maybe not low enough,
see other posts in this thread) cross connects.  It's common to see
a pair of public peers fill up a significant part of their port,
and then move to a private peering model getting off the IXP and
onto glass directly.

When the IXP is distributed, this becomes glass between buildings,
often requiring yet another supplier as well.  The MRCs are higher
making the justification to move off harder.  What happens is rather
than moving off to glass, they have to buy faster/more ports from
the IXP and move the traffic over the IXP.

The IXP becomes the go-to monopoly as a result.

Now, perhaps IXP's are more benevolent than data center opertors,
and this is a good trade.  I think one thing the presentation was
asking people to do was step back, look at the situation, and
reevaluate that particular tradeoff.

--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/

--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=enZw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post