[190144] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Jun 16 11:56:07 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:56:01 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160616151719.GB9938@excession.tpb.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> This thread is full of people who have never run large L2 networks
> stating their opinions on running large L2 networks, and they
> invariably underestimate their complexity and the logistics required.
maybe the complexity and the logistics required are WHY they don't build
large L2 networks. SMITH: Doctor, it hurts when I do this. DALE: Don't
do that.
> sFlow statistics isn't a luxury function. Neither is remote peering.
by 'remote peering' do you mean an exchange essentially selling transit?
randy
