[190134] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?UTF-8?B?WmJ5bsSbayBQb3Nww61jaGFs)
Thu Jun 16 08:22:37 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
From: "=?UTF-8?B?WmJ5bsSbayBQb3Nww61jaGFs?=" <zbynek@dialtelecom.cz>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:21:35 +0200
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1606152006310.28955@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Dne 15.06.16 v 20:10 Mikael Abrahamsson napsal(a):
> Well, the customers also wanted more functions and features. They wanted
> sFLOW statistics to show traffic, customer portals, better SLAs,
> distributed IXes, remote peering, more hand-holding when connecting etc.
Are you sure they still want them if they have to pay for these features
separately?
Currently, such luxury functions are increasing costs also for
networks who don't need/want it.
Best Regards,
Zbynek
