[190118] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Thu Jun 16 02:27:23 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ2h61aME_LuoaU53UG4KD2b=jdZCksXVTyMOQbOBEzpAgJsMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:27:16 -0500
To: Leslie <geekgirl@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 01:12, Leslie <geekgirl@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
> <snip>
>> SFMIX is great. But poorly distributed. We should support their efforts, b=
ut how many IXPs do we need in the Bay area? AMS-IX Bay Area is creating a m=
arket along with SFMIX.
>=20
> SFMIX is in 5 physical locations(
> https://www.sfmix.org/connect/locations ) and is always open to
> talking to other providers about extending into their datacenter. So
> I'd say we're in a variety of locations! We've also just celebrated
> our 10 year anniversary :)
>=20
> Leslie
Agreed. Extended XC?
Best,
-M<
