[190116] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Wed Jun 15 23:41:28 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:41:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGTE3D_jcObRKcOMceWGxe9N9hmb=k0RjPJvNnBRyjCXDA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Jun 15, 2016, at 22:24, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>> On Wednesday, June 15, 2016, Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us> wrote:
>>=20
>>> On 6/15/16 4:03 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>>=20
[ clip ]
>=20
> I also like sfmix and fl-ix.
FL-IX is great. It created real competition in the American South and for th=
e Americas peering. I kept my interconnections to VZ while we see what happe=
ns when Zayo needs to recover their costs for the panel they're using to dra=
in NOTA. There will be a day of reckoning, free is never free. Its a good h=
edge.=20
SFMIX is great. But poorly distributed. We should support their efforts, but=
how many IXPs do we need in the Bay area? AMS-IX Bay Area is creating a mar=
ket along with SFMIX.=20
There is still copious amounts of traffic at VZ NOTA MIA. Two in a market wo=
rks well IMHO.=20
Best,
-M<
