[190066] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Tue Jun 14 16:22:34 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAFN0R26s22kpK_97WtKBbG-iNUkzpn2pZ24kWMsJih=+-WSKQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:20:19 -0400
To: Matt Peterson <matt@peterson.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Matt Peterson <matt@peterson.org> wrote:
>=20
> This week at NANOG67, a presentation was given early on that did not
> reflect well for our community at large.
I think that the data presented was interesting but the style of
the presenter and tone could have been different. It seemed
to be a variant of =E2=80=9CThe Rent is Too Damn High=E2=80=9D[1] while =
it can
be interesting, there wasn=E2=80=99t a complete talk there IMHO.
The feedback mechanism for this is honestly the survey[2]. I=E2=80=99m =
confident
that the PC will take this input seriously and work with presenters
in this regard.
The IXP cost sheet[3] that is being maintained by Job I think gives an
idea of the peering vs transit costs assuming various bitrates and
list prices.
The fates of IXPs and their roles will naturally resolve itself through
market economics I suspect.
- Jared
- snip - links - snip -
1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent_Is_Too_Damn_High_Party
2 - https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog67/survey
3 - =
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18ztPX_ysWYqEhJlf2SKQQsTNRbkwoxPSfa=
C6ScEZAG8/edit#gid=3D0=
