[190049] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Tue Jun 14 12:36:32 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information
From: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADn4PSiHn7od6auZY53-WLxnwyVW9fgC0dtwRUjpknvkHZRbZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:33:12 -0500
To: Daniel Golding <dgolding@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Daniel Golding <dgolding@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> John,
>=20
> We've had this for years. https://www.nanog.org/governance/attendance
>=20
> If you notice similarities - they are intentional.
<chuckle>
> If you notice differences - NANOG has always had a higher threshold =
for a
> frank exchange of views between participants. We have no desire to =
stifle
> that.
Makes perfect sense to me - thanks for the pointer!
So, you=E2=80=99ve set expectations, and those include a clear reporting =
and enforcement
process, so is discussion of the session in question (I actually have no =
idea which=20
one it is ) on a mailing list really the right approach? Alternatively =
should folks who=20
feel there was an issue just follow the reporting process? (rhetorical =
question)
/John
Disclaimer: my views alone. =20
