[189858] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Peach)
Wed Jun 8 11:36:28 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 11:33:44 -0400
From: John Peach <john-nanog@peachfamily.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20160608153031.GA2257@cmadams.net>
Reply-To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--Sig_/bEcbimlMVTaF9vomNaUoHht
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mine, whilst not identifying me personally, has detail down to the
correct town and zipcode.
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:30:31 -0500
Chris Adams <cma@cmadams.net> wrote:
> Once upon a time, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> said:
> > Contrary to your repeated assertions, HE tunnels are NOT anonymous.
> >=20
> > HE operates a perfectly fine RWHOIS server that provides sufficient
> > information about each tunnel that it cannot be considered
> > anonymous.
>=20
> Unless that information is verified, it is effectively anonymous. I
> had an HE tunnel years ago, and the only verified information was my
> email address.
>=20
--Sig_/bEcbimlMVTaF9vomNaUoHht
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXWDrcAAoJEFkW2a9BKTSsYrEIAMxLJNEo/igpvUfQ+/Gr0IbY
flMXud3MEkT0pN/30FOhRx//uCgGvebuXuUyih33kyuE2CxEAXtlOfEA/tTQyRZu
61Gy8/Svvbzn9Y6sS2B+d6PXEYAK64RDEM/rwxVuLJHNrGU+lzi9BY4KzVOMohFH
l+5lp02tmw6kay9QZN/lj481fhgQ2qcbHVvqs3GQQpea2J++KgrlWL8f/bBrlniU
98ZZNcq5rdCh9Gjx299MJSOZsUstZND+Tevb3KD7iYVKsfM9K7cHxQHdA2yvyFQD
Z+w90+/WfQKtgEXMF02Wg2ITT5Gs+0zqgYBhCmGyzABICCJ4/e5T4KgianvX5bk=
=CGWT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/bEcbimlMVTaF9vomNaUoHht--
