[189786] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ca By)
Mon Jun 6 21:28:21 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAGFn2k1EJ_5R=_OBbRvQQeBxCtQ2kno62a-jozNWzyhm-3jjEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 18:28:16 -0700
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks-why-and-how.html
> >
> > Wherein akamai explains a detailed study showing ipv6 is "well
> > over 10%" faster than ipv4 on mobile, and they reference corroborating
> > studies from Linkedin and Facebook.
> >
>
> Says the company that consistently refused to dual-stack its customers by
> default...
>
>
>
>
Looks like akamai is going default ipv4 and ipv6 for new customers.
https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/four-years-since-world-ipv6-launch-entering-the-mainstream.html
AWS / Cloudfront / Fastly - please have a look at how it is done. I think
Cloudflare already did this.
> Rubens
>
