[189532] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hugo Slabbert)
Wed Jun 1 14:08:04 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:04:11 -0700
From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com>
To: Jason Lee <jason.m.lee@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABD5cRc99eDwvc6FvuU_kXJ_Ev+dD2E20YiPPwDSPdkqRM5gPg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--vKFfOv5t3oGVpiF+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed 2016-Jun-01 12:58:15 -0500, Jason Lee <jason.m.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
>NANOG Community,
>
>Typically where would you expect a service provider to monitor bandwidth
>usage on your circuits? On the physical switch port interface or on the
>vlan interface at the router? In some of the field testing I've been doing
>there can be a difference in the bandwidth usage on the vlan interface at
>the router vs the physical switch port. Is there any particular reason for
>using one vs the other? Is there an industry best practice for this?
How big of a difference? Full frame / L2 (@ switch) vs. L3 payload (@=20
router)?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jason
--=20
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo@slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
--vKFfOv5t3oGVpiF+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=MM1Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--vKFfOv5t3oGVpiF+--
