[189478] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Public DNS64
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hugo Slabbert)
Mon May 30 11:18:58 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 08:18:53 -0700
From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160530014512.04C3E4A4A3DE@rock.dv.isc.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--8nsIa27JVQLqB7/C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon 2016-May-30 11:45:11 +1000, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
>
>In message <CAPkb-7Dcfwzy2amNXJS0jQKm1S36N8c5p=3DSpjMbeWFRt4OOphw@mail.gma=
il.com>
>, Baldur Norddahl writes:
>> Ok that would be a bad idea. Nat64 is not stateless so to anycast it wou=
ld
>> be unstable.
>
>This is not anycast NAT64. It is anycast DNS64 with the well known
>64:ff9b::/96 prefix and a local NAT64 box.
>
>While I don't like DNS64 as a solution, this service doesn't need
>to be critised for faults that don't exist with it.
Pretty sure this was in response to:
>> > Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the
>> > 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service.
=2E..so specifically regarding the idea of a public, anycast NAT64 service,=
=20
rather than the public DNS64 service Google is doing.
>
>Mark
--=20
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo@slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
>
>> Sorry time to get to sleep.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Baldur
>> Den 30. maj 2016 03.25 skrev "Baldur Norddahl" <baldur.norddahl@gmail.co=
m>:
>>
>> > Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the
>> > 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service.
>> > Den 30. maj 2016 03.08 skrev "Tim Durack" <tdurack@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> For the record:
>> >>
>> >> Tim,
>> >>
>> >> I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this
>> >> thread:
>> >>
>> >> https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html
>> >>
>> >> but I figured I'd let you know that:
>> >>
>> >> https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64
>> >>
>> >> is now available for testing. Perhaps it will be some use.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> -Erik
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tim Durack <tdurack@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service?
>> >> >
>> >> > Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could =
point
>> >> > the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network.
>> >> >
>> >> > Why? Other people are better than me at running DNS resolvers :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Tim:>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Tim:>
>> >>
>> >
>--=20
>Mark Andrews, ISC
>1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
--8nsIa27JVQLqB7/C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=YiPP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--8nsIa27JVQLqB7/C--
